Holec J., Bednarik M., Liščák P. & Žilka A., 2018: Assessment of debris flow susceptibility using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses and verification based on catastrophic events from 2014 in the Krivánska Malá Fatra Mountains, Slovakia. Acta Geologica Slovaca, 10, 1, 1–19.
Assessment of debris flow susceptibility using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses and verification based on catastrophic events from 2014 in the Krivánska Malá Fatra Mountains, Slovakia
Juraj Holec1, Martin Bednarik2, Pavel Liščák3, Andrej Žilka3 & Ladislav Vitovič1
1Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Ilkovičova 6, SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovakia; juraj.holec@uniba.sk, vitovic2@uniba.sk
2Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Engineering Geology, Ilkovičova 6, SK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia; mbednarik@fns.uniba.sk
3State Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr, Mlynská dolina 1, SK-817 04 Bratislava, Slovakia; pavel.liscak@geology.sk, andrej.zilka@geology.sk
Abstract
The presented study shows using of bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses in mountain area of the Krivánska Fatra Mountains affected by debris flows. Three generations of data were studied in order to assess the debris flows in the area, from these two main periods of debris flows were taken into the analysis: the debris flows from 1950s to 1970s and catastrophic debris flows from July 2014. Various input data were used in the statistical analyses: elevation, slope angle, plan curvature, topographic wetness index, flow accumulation, lithology, and land cover. Two main evaluations were made: first using the older debris flow data and second using debris flow data from the both periods. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed in order to assess the reliability of the models with the area under curve more than 95 % for both evaluations and more than 85% for the first evaluation checked by both periods of debris flows in case of multivariate analysis, respectively almost 83% and 80% in case of bivariate analysis. The comparison with existing avalanche tracks was performed as well and shows satisfactory results. The tracks of debris flows from July 2014 show the extraordinariness of the event in comparison with older debris flows. Experimental assessment of natural hazard was performed using the map of difference between the two susceptibility maps in order to find out the areas of possible high magnitude low frequency events.
Key words: Krivánska Fatra Mts., debris flow, susceptibility map, multivariate analysis, bivariate analysis, validation processes
Manuscript received: 2017-10-01
Revised version accepted: 2018-05-11
Information
Forthcoming articles
AGEOS 2024, Vol. 16, Issue 1
- Hoppanová E., Ferenc Š, Mikuš T., Dolníček Z., Kopáčik R., Vlasáč J. & Šimonová V.: Hydrothermal quartz-baryte veins containing Pb-Cu-Sb-(Bi) mineralization at Brusno-Brzáčka occurrence (Veporic Unit, Central Slovakia) and their supergene alteration
- Vojtko R. & Kriváňová K.: Cretaceous collision and thrusting of the Veporic Unit onto Tatric Unit in the Nízke Tatry Mts. revealed from structural analysis
- Aherwar K., Šujan M., Chyba A., Rózsová B. & Aster Team: Authigenic 10Be/9Be dating of the Horná Štubňa river terrace points to the inception of the terrace staircase formation in the Turiec Basin (Slovakia) from the Middle Pleistocene transition
- Krčmář D., Hodasová K., Ondrejková I. & Fľaková R.: Impact of clogging layer disruption on riverbed sediment permeability: An experimental study on the Torysa River, eastern Slovakia
- Aubrecht R. & Bačík P.: Palaeokarst with bauxite filling near Čoltovo (Slovak Karst)
Archive
- AGEOS 2023, Vol. 15, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2023, Vol. 15, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2022, Vol. 14, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2022, Vol. 14, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2021, Vol. 13, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2021, Vol. 13, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2020, Vol. 12, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2020, Vol. 12, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2019, Vol. 11, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2019, Vol. 11, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2018, Vol. 10, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2018, Vol. 10, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2017, Vol. 9, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2017, Vol. 9, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2016, Vol. 8, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2016, Vol. 8, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2015, Vol. 7, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2015, Vol. 7, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2014, Vol. 6, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2014, Vol. 6, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2013, Vol. 5, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2013, Vol. 5, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2012, monograph
- AGEOS 2012, Vol. 4, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2012, Vol. 4, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2011, Vol. 3, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2011, Vol. 3, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2010, Vol. 2, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2010, Vol. 2, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2009, Vol. 1, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2009, Vol. 1, Issue 1