Uhlík P., Jánošík M., Kraus I., Pentrák M. & Čaplovičová M., 2012: Characterisation of bentonite from Hliník nad Hronom deposit (Jastrabá Formation of the Štiavnica stratovolcano, Western Carpathians). Acta Geologica Slovaca, 4, 2, 125–137. (in Slovak with English summary)
Charakterizácia bentonitu z ložiska Hliník nad Hronom (jastrabská formácia štiavnického stratovulkánu, Západné Karpaty)
Characterisation of bentonite from Hliník nad Hronom deposit (Jastrabá Formation of the Štiavnica stratovolcano, Western Carpathians)
Peter Uhlík1, Martin Jánošík1, Ivan Kraus1, Martin Pentrák2 & Mária Čaplovičová1
1Katedra ložiskovej geológie, Prírodovedecká fakulta, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Mlynská dolina G, 842 15 Bratislava; uhlik@fns.uniba.sk
2Ústav anorganickej chémie, Slovenská akadémia vied, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 36 Bratislava
Abstract
The Hliník nad Hronom bentonite deposit is situated in Jastrabá Formation on the NW margin of the Štiavnické vrchy Mts. Geological exploration was realised in the deposit at the end of eighties. The bentonite was described as lower quality. The deposit is very rarely operated. The purpose of presented study was characterisation of the bentonite predominately by actual X-ray diffraction techniques and infrared spectroscopy and comparison of the Hliník nad Hronom deposit with other Western Carpathian bentonites. Studied bentonite and bentonized rhyolitic tuff from Hliník nad Hronom were composed of 30–53 wt % of Al-Mg montmorillonite, 19–45 wt % of opal-C or opal-CT, mostly less than 14 wt % of volcanic glass and less than 10 wt % of K-feldspar. Also illite, biotite, kaolinite and other were determined as minor and trace mineral phases. Cation-exchange capacity (CEC) of bulk rock samples ranged from 30 to 65 meq/100g. CEC was significantly higher in clay fraction (85–95 meq/100g) that is in good correlation with presence of almost pure montmorillonite. The BWA analysis of montmorillonite 001 XRD peaks was performed to calculate the mean crystallite size and the crystallite size distribution. Surface controlled crystal growth mechanism was determined for Hliník nad Hronom´s montmorillonite according to calculated parameters of lognormal particle thickness distribution (α and β2), similarly as for other Western Carpathian smectites. The mean thickness of smectite particles from Hliník nad Hronom (about 6.78 nm) belongs to the lowest values that were calculated for Western Carpathian smectites. Based on the presented results and previous knowledge, we can assume that the deposit originated in lacustrine environment. The insufficient fluid flow rate caused the precipitation of high amount of opal-C or/and opal-CT. The crystallisation temperature of smectites was low, only 20–50°C, at the bentonitization of rhyolitic tuff of Hliník nad Hronom area.
Key words: bentonite, Hliník nad Hronom, montmorillonite, opal-C/CT, CEC, thickness distributions
Manuscript received: 2011-12-28
Revised version accepted: 2012-05-11
Information
Forthcoming articles
AGEOS 2024, Vol. 16, Issue 2
- Hyžný M. & Mihálik D.: Decapod crustacean assemblage from the middle Miocene (Badenian) of the Oslip sand pit, Austria (Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin)
- Lačný A., Vojtko R., Dušeková L. & Čahojová L.: Dolines as important indicators of lithology and tectonics: A case study of the Malé Karpaty Mts. (Western Carpathians)
- Dugovič R. & Malík P.: Drought hazard assessment using GIS Comparison of groundwater runoff of three different hydrogeological units in the Western Carpathians determined by Kille’s and hydrograph separation methods
- Tornyai R. & Koudelka D.: Utilisation of airborne laser scanning data in landslide hazard assessment – case study Čadca district, Slovakia
- Bláha P., Niyazov R., Abdullaev S., Motorniy I. & Lazecký M.: Human-induced landslides in the Angren coal district, Uzbekistan
Archive
- AGEOS 2024, Vol. 16, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2024, Vol. 16, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2023, Vol. 15, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2023, Vol. 15, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2022, Vol. 14, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2022, Vol. 14, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2021, Vol. 13, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2021, Vol. 13, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2020, Vol. 12, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2020, Vol. 12, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2019, Vol. 11, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2019, Vol. 11, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2018, Vol. 10, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2018, Vol. 10, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2017, Vol. 9, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2017, Vol. 9, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2016, Vol. 8, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2016, Vol. 8, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2015, Vol. 7, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2015, Vol. 7, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2014, Vol. 6, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2014, Vol. 6, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2013, Vol. 5, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2013, Vol. 5, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2012, monograph
- AGEOS 2012, Vol. 4, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2012, Vol. 4, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2011, Vol. 3, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2011, Vol. 3, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2010, Vol. 2, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2010, Vol. 2, Issue 1
- AGEOS 2009, Vol. 1, Issue 2
- AGEOS 2009, Vol. 1, Issue 1